Clark and Van Til, Before the Controversy

For part of the biography I’m writing on Gordon Clark I’m researching into the relationship of Clark to his later philosophic adversary, Cornelius Van Til.

In 1936 (and perhaps in later years) Clark actually taught from Van Til’s material at Wheaton College. In prior years it seems they knew each other in Philadelphia and often had discussion on philosophy.

I’ve recently received four letters from the Orthodox Presbyterian Church archives between the two philosophers. Signs of the controversy still years away are evident in these letters. Clark, characteristically, critiques Van Til’s poor word definitions in a letter of August 28, 1937:

“You use the word knowledge in the Biblical sense of to know and love. Hence when someone objects that Paul says that the heathen know God, which seems to make possible a common ground, you reply that the heathen do not know God because they do not love him. Thus you avoid, not to say evade, the difficulties which arise from the consideration of what some call purely intellectual knowledge. But, may I ask ,when you say knowledge is knowledge and love, what does the second knowledge mean? Naturally, the definiendum cannot occur in the definition. How does this second knowledge occur? Within this strict sphere has the regenerate no common ground with the unregenerate? My impression is that you oscillate between love and that second knowledge to an extent which makes your simple word knowledge too ambiguous for exact usage.”

Later in this same letter Clark critiques Van Til’s “solution” the problem of the one and the many.  It seems that the archive is missing Van Til’s response.  Three extent letters are from Clark and only one from Van Til.

Advertisements

About douglasdouma

I am a graduate of the University of Michigan (BSME), Wake Forest University (MBA), and Sangre de Cristo Seminary (Mdiv). I've learned far more from books than in school. I'm particularly in debt to Martin Luther, Ludwig von Mises, and Gordon H. Clark for any thoughts I have.
This entry was posted in Notes on the thought of Gordon H. Clark. Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Clark and Van Til, Before the Controversy

  1. Pingback: Doug Douma: Clark and Van Til, Before the Controversy | Reformed Libertarian

  2. Hugh McCann says:

    Doug, I think you mean “extant,” not “extent.”
    Could you publish the letters here?

    • douglasdouma says:

      Yeah, you’re right. Sometimes I don’t word so well.

      We are working on transcribing GHC’s letters. I’ve located 695 letters to date. About 200 have been transcribed. Dr. Talbot at Whitefield Seminary will likely get them published with his Whitefield Media. So, we won’t be making them available on the website, but the best will be put in the volume for publication. I’m just about done transcribing the best ones. I could use some people to proofread. If you’re interested, email me douglasdouma@yahoo.com

  3. CJ Mayo says:

    Could you send me a scan of his critique of Van Til’s solution to the problem of universals? It’s a solution that is foundational to my own mediating (between Clark and Van Til) epistemology, including wrt our sense experience, so it’s of great personal interest (not to say import) to me. I’d not want to go to press with a foundation that others more intelligent than myself were able to debunk when I intuited rock-solidity.

    I would proof-read unpublished epistles as well.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s